Opportunism refers to the practice of taking advantage of opportunities as they arise, often with little regard for principles or long-term consequences. On the other hand, populism is a political approach that seeks to appeal to the interests and concerns of ordinary people, often by presenting simplistic solutions to complex issues and by demonizing elites. While opportunism is more about seizing immediate advantages, populism is about appealing to the emotions and grievances of the general public to gain support. **

Populism is a political approach that seeks to appeal to the interests and concerns of ordinary people, often by presenting themselves as anti-elitist and championing the needs of the common people. On the other hand, opportunism is the practice of taking advantage of opportunities as and when they arise, often without regard for principles or ethics. While populism can be a genuine political ideology that aims to address the grievances of the masses, opportunism is more about seizing opportunities for personal gain or advancement. **

Opportunity refers to a favorable or advantageous circumstance that arises, providing a chance for progress or advancement. It is typically seen as a positive situation that can be leveraged for personal or professional growth. On the other hand, opportunism involves taking advantage of situations solely for personal gain, often without regard for ethical considerations or the well-being of others. Opportunism is generally viewed in a negative light, as it involves exploiting circumstances for self-interest rather than genuine benefit or progress. **

Machiavellianism refers to a strategic and manipulative approach to achieving one's goals, often involving deceit and cunning tactics. It is associated with a calculated and long-term perspective on gaining power and influence. Opportunism, on the other hand, involves taking advantage of immediate opportunities as they arise, without necessarily having a long-term plan or strategy in place. Opportunism is more focused on seizing the moment and making the most of current circumstances, rather than following a premeditated and calculated path like Machiavellianism. **

No, the FDP (Free Democratic Party) cannot be considered the new CDU (Christian Democratic Union) of opportunism. While both parties have been known for their pragmatic approach to politics, the FDP has historically focused on liberal economic policies and individual freedoms, while the CDU has been associated with conservative values and Christian democracy. Additionally, the FDP has often been seen as a party that advocates for smaller government and free market principles, while the CDU has a broader base of support and a different ideological focus. Therefore, it would be inaccurate to equate the two parties in terms of opportunism. **

The choice between a free market economy and a planned economy depends on the specific goals and values of a society. A free market economy allows for individual freedom and competition, which can lead to innovation and efficiency. However, it can also result in inequality and lack of regulation. On the other hand, a planned economy allows for more control and distribution of resources, but it can stifle individual initiative and innovation. Ultimately, the decision between the two depends on the balance a society seeks between individual freedom and social equality. **

The answer to this question depends on one's perspective and values. A social market economy combines elements of both a free market and government intervention to ensure social welfare and economic stability. It aims to balance individual freedom with social responsibility. On the other hand, a free market economy prioritizes individual freedom and minimal government intervention, allowing for more competition and innovation. Ultimately, the "better" system depends on the specific needs and values of a society, as well as the balance between individual freedom and social welfare that is desired. **

Online commerce refers to the buying and selling of goods and services over the internet, while retail commerce refers to the traditional brick-and-mortar stores where customers can physically visit and make purchases. Online commerce offers the convenience of shopping from anywhere at any time, while retail commerce provides the opportunity for customers to see, touch, and try products before making a purchase. Online commerce often involves lower overhead costs and can reach a wider audience, while retail commerce provides a more personalized and immediate shopping experience. **